- About Us
- About Colleges
-
Corporate Services
- Corporate Services
- Brexit
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability & Grievance
- Employment Briefings Library
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
- Governance
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Resources
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- Erasmus+ EXPECT Project
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Higher and Extended Project Qualifications
- OfS - Higher Education Social Prescribing Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase 2
- Pears #Iwill Youth Social Action Apprenticeship Project
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- T Level Curriculum Macro-Sequencing
- Contact the Projects Team
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Recruitment & Consultancy
-
Events & Training
- Events & Training
- Events
- T Level & T Level Foundation Year Events
- Network Meetings
- Annual Conference & Exhibition 2023 Resources
- Previous Events & Webinars
- In-House Training
- Senior Leadership Development Programme
- Introducing AoC's Early Career and Experienced Middle Managers Programme
- Sponsorship & Exhibition Opportunities
- Funding & Finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- 14-16 Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- Research Unit
- News, Campaigns & Parliament
- Love Our Colleges
- Home
- News, Campaigns & Parliament
- AoC Blogs
- Inspection system needs to work in current education landscape
Inspection system needs to work in current education landscape
When he launched this year’s Ofsted Annual Report, Sir Michael Wilshaw said ‘many FE colleges are facing a period of continuing turmoil’.
In recent years colleges have coped with a maelstrom of Government changes, policy changes, funding cuts and the area review. With all this going on, it’s not surprising that colleges are having a tough time. But they are resilient, continuing to serve the needs of their students, employers and the wider local community and economy.
In his Annual Report, Sir Michael also says that our education system is not yet world class, but is closer than it’s ever been. In further education (FE), the sector is 78% good or better, but where the report is critical of FE colleges we suspect that the Common Inspection Framework (CIF) isn’t asking the right questions.
The report observes that the Government’s policy of making students who fail to get at least a C grade in GCSE English and maths to resit the exams, isn’t yet working. The current policy is causing problems – for example, is it clear to us all, including Ofsted inspectors, what outstanding English and maths resit outcomes should look like in the FE sector? What are the benchmarks for resits?
The current framework and accountability measures are not sympathetic to the differences between schools and FE colleges, which do deliver A Levels, but where the majority of learning is on technical programmes, apprenticeships and other work-based courses. These might need a different approach to inspection because of more focus on practical, hands-on learning.
No framework or measure in itself can ever be perfect, but could it be argued that the CIF is trying to do too much? The education system is very much geared towards the needs of an academic curriculum. We may have ended up with a system that tries to measure and inspect colleges against school-based standards. Technical education is distinctive, so does it need a new or adapted framework that celebrates its distinctive nature?
There are many reasons to be optimistic. The Government’s Post-16 Skills Plan will develop the technical and professional education system, to make it easier to understand and more attractive to a larger number of people. But this might need a review of the current inspection framework and more attention on how technical and professional education and training is inspected and assessed.
Colleges are working extremely hard to meet the needs of their students while also meeting the requirements of the Government and Ofsted. Perhaps it’s time for us to sit down and review both the policy for English and maths and how the CIF will work for the new skills plan routes. Whichever way they choose to go, they must try to find a system that works better for all in the current and future education landscape.
David Corke is the Director of Education Policy at the Association of Colleges