- About us
- About colleges
-
Corporate services
- Corporate services
- Mental health and wellbeing
- AoC Student Engagement Charter
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment: How we support members
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability, Grievance & Harassment
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Holiday/annual leave related
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
- Governance
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Resources
- Contact the projects team
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Creative Arts in FE 2025 – developing student voice through creativity
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- GCSE Resits Hub Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase Two
- Pears Youth Social Action Programme - phase three
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Film London - Metro London Skills Cluster
- Empowering FE: enhancing skills with technology
- Empowering FE: enhancing skills with technology project - data protection privacy notice
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Brexit
- Ofsted Inspection Support
- AoC charters
-
Recruitment and consultancy
- Recruitment and consultancy
- Meet The Team
- Recruitment and consultancy: How we support members
- Executive Recruitment
- Interim Recruitment
- Governance Recruitment
- College Vacancies
- Consultancy
- The College Collective
- External Board Reviews
- AoC Jobs
- Recruitment and consultancy case studies
- Senior Post Holder Appraisal and Chair Review
- Chair Review
-
Events and training
- Events and training
- Events
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Events
- Events and training: How we support members
- Network Meetings
- Previous Events and Webinars
- In-House Training
- Senior Leadership Development Programme
- Early Career and Experienced Managers' Programme
- Sponsorship and Exhibition Opportunities
- Funding and finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy: How we support members
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC 2030 Group
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- 14-16 Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- International Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- Opportunity England
- Research unit
-
News, campaigns and parliament
- News, campaigns and parliament
- AoC Newsroom
- AoC Blogs
- Briefings
- AoC Campaigns
- College case studies
-
Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Media relations: 10 ways to build effective relationships with the media
- How to choose a PR agency
- Legal considerations for communications and media work
- How to plan for a new build
- Crisis communications: your go-to guide
- How to handle photo consent for media and marketing
- How to evaluate a PR and media campaign
- How to react to regulation, funding and restructuring issues
- How to react quickly and effectively to the media
- Working with the media: a complete guide
- How to write a compelling case study
- How to write for the web
- Communications, marketing and campaigns community
- Communications, media, marketing and research: how we support members
- Work in Parliament
- Election resources
-
Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion blogs
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter for further education sector organisations
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter signatories
- Diversity in Leadership
- Black FE Leadership Group and AoC partnership agreement
- AoC's Equity Exchange
- Equality, diversity and inclusion: how we support members
- Equality, diversity and inclusion case studies
- ETF Inclusive Leadership Coaching Programme
- Equality, diversity and inclusion briefings
- AoC Sport Diversity and Inclusion Action Plan
- Home
- News, campaigns and parliament
- AoC Newsroom
- Colleges call for a GCSE retake ‘single lock’
Colleges call for a GCSE retake ‘single lock’
Colleges call for a GCSE retake ‘single lock’ to support some of the most disadvantaged students in the country
Ahead of next week’s GCSE results, the Association of Colleges, which represents more than 90% of England’s colleges, is asking for a ‘single lock’ to support the future progress of over 120,000 young people who were due to resit their English and maths GCSEs in colleges this summer. Put simply, AoC is asking for the final grade to be what their teachers and lecturers painstakingly assessed, with no algorithm used.Without actual exams to go by, OfQual has implemented a similar process for GCSEs as was used for A Level results this week. Those A Level results showed that algorithms do not work for every student and did not work for many colleges. The algorithms are particularly inappropriate where prior achievement is low and where institutional performance has changed in recent years.The Association is therefore calling for teacher assessed grades to be honoured and not be subject to any statistical adjustment because:
These are among the most disadvantaged students in our system, around 70% of this cohort are from disadvantaged groups.
Colleges approached the process of producing Centre Assessment Grades (CAGs) very rigorously using robust evidence and applying challenge and moderation to ensure consistent standards.
The GCSE grade 3 /4 boundary is a cliff edge and falling the ‘wrong’ side of it has a profound and long-term impact on students’ lives
Previous post-16 retake results are not a reliable guide to these students’ achievement, so it is particularly arbitrary for them to have an algorithm decide which side of that cliff edge they fall.
David Hughes, Chief Executive of the Association of Colleges said:
"Removing GCSE resit students from the results algorithm is the right thing to do to for some of the most disadvantaged students in the country. Honouring teachers’ grade 4 predictions will give thousands of students the backing they need to progress after a very disrupted period. Colleges want to help them get back into learning after lockdown and make progress onto their next course. This will be one less challenge to face as they continue with their studies. It will be the break they need to show that the system is looking after their interests.”