- About us
- About colleges
-
Corporate services
- Corporate services
- Mental health and wellbeing
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment: How we support members
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability & Grievance
- Employment Briefings Library
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Holiday/annual leave related
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
- Governance
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Projects: How we support members
- Resources
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- Erasmus+ EXPECT Project
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Higher and Extended Project Qualifications
- OfS - Higher Education Social Prescribing Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase 2
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- T Level Curriculum Macro-Sequencing
- Contact the Projects Team
- DfE Multiply Capability Support Programme
- Creative Arts in FE 2024 – developing student voice through creativity
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Brexit
- Recruitment and consultancy
-
Events and training
- Events and training
- Events
- T Level & T Level Foundation Year Events
- Events and training: How we support members
- Network Meetings
- Annual Conference & Exhibition 2023 Resources
- Previous Events & Webinars
- In-House Training
- Senior Leadership Development Programme
- Introducing AoC's Early Career and Experienced Middle Managers Programme
- Sponsorship & Exhibition Opportunities
- Funding and finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy: How we support members
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- 14-16 Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- Opportunity England
- Research unit
-
News, campaigns and parliament
- News, campaigns and parliament
- General and mayoral election resources
- Comms advice and resources for colleges
- AoC Newsroom
- AoC Blogs
- Work in Parliament
- AoC Campaigns
- Briefings
- Contact the Communications, Media, Marketing and Research Team
- Communications, media, marketing and research: How we support members
-
Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion blogs
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter
- Diversity in Leadership
- Black FE Leadership Group and AoC partnership agreement
- AoC's Equity Exchange
- Equality, diversity and inclusion: how we support members
- Equality, diversity and inclusion case studies
- Home
- News, campaigns and parliament
- AoC Newsroom
- T Level decisions undermine confidence in qualification, says AoC
T Level decisions undermine confidence in qualification, says AoC
Recent decisions on T Levels are undermining confidence in the qualifications and making it harder for colleges to deliver the high-quality technical offer for young people, the Association of Colleges (AoC) has said.
In a letter to the Minister for Skills, Apprenticeships and Higher Education, Robert Halfon, AoC’s Chief Executive David Hughes said that colleges cannot make firm plans on T Levels if they do not have certainty and confidence about the future.
Colleges cannot recruit if learners and their advisers also lack that certainty and confidence, he added.
In the letter he said: “As you know, the lead-in time to properly introduce new qualifications is long, allowing for marketing, CPD, development of teaching materials and so on. Beyond that, learners and their advisers want to know that the qualification will be around for the long term if they are to dedicate two years to it. Sadly, the lead-in times and the confidence in the longevity of T Levels have both been lacking.”
He highlighted three issues which have arisen in the past few days: further delays in introduction of qualifications and very late notice in the academic cycle, delays in information on funding and information on future pricing of T Level awarding organisation fees.
Reflecting on the last-minute decision to cancel plans to introduce a T Level in hairdressing, barbering and beauty therapy, Mr Hughes said: “The short-term damage in that sector is one thing, but the wider dent in confidence of the T Level programme is enormous. I fear that many college leaders, students and their advisers will be even more wary of all T Levels now because they cannot be certain about their future.”
On delays in information on funding, Mr Hughes said: “2024/25 will be the fifth year in which colleges and other institutions are running T Levels but even this late in the academic year, no firm information is available on the revenue funding rates and rules.”
He added that he was “alarmed” at the proposal on future pricing of T Level fees seen in the tender documents and the potential impact on the T level programme and on individual colleges.
The full letter can be read here.