- About us
- About colleges
-
Corporate services
- Corporate services
- Mental health and wellbeing
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment: How we support members
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability & Grievance
- Employment Briefings Library
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Holiday/annual leave related
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
- Governance
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Projects: How we support members
- Resources
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- Erasmus+ EXPECT Project
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Higher and Extended Project Qualifications
- OfS - Higher Education Social Prescribing Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase 2
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- T Level Curriculum Macro-Sequencing
- Contact the Projects Team
- DfE Multiply Capability Support Programme
- Creative Arts in FE 2024 – developing student voice through creativity
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Brexit
- Recruitment and consultancy
-
Events and training
- Events and training
- Events
- T Level & T Level Foundation Year Events
- Events and training: How we support members
- Network Meetings
- Annual Conference & Exhibition 2023 Resources
- Previous Events & Webinars
- In-House Training
- Senior Leadership Development Programme
- Introducing AoC's Early Career and Experienced Middle Managers Programme
- Sponsorship & Exhibition Opportunities
- Funding and finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy: How we support members
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- 14-16 Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- Opportunity England
- Research unit
-
News, campaigns and parliament
- News, campaigns and parliament
- General and mayoral election resources
- Comms advice and resources for colleges
- AoC Newsroom
- AoC Blogs
- Work in Parliament
- AoC Campaigns
- Briefings
- Contact the Communications, Media, Marketing and Research Team
- Communications, media, marketing and research: How we support members
-
Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion blogs
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter
- Diversity in Leadership
- Black FE Leadership Group and AoC partnership agreement
- AoC's Equity Exchange
- Equality, diversity and inclusion: How we support members
- Equality, diversity and inclusion case studies
- Home
- News, campaigns and parliament
- AoC Blogs
- AoC welcomes evaluation of the Strategic College Improvement Fund (SCIF)
AoC welcomes evaluation of the Strategic College Improvement Fund (SCIF)
The Strategic College Improvement Fund (SCIF) is a Department for Education (DfE) funded peer support improvement programme. An applicant college which has been judged by Ofsted as ‘requires improvement’ (grade 3) or ‘inadequate’ (grade 4), works in partnership with a higher performing partner college to bring about quality improvement. The total number of colleges now participating is fifty.
The DfE has commissioned a process evaluation to review pilot SCIF processes and identify lessons learned. AoC has commented on this evaluation and has offered a sector view of the impact of SCIF and made some suggestions about the future of college self-improvement peer networks. The AoC commentary on the process evaluation is available here.
The SCIF model of peer-led self-improvement has overwhelming support from applicant and partner colleges. They welcomed the focus on sector self-improvement, the encouragement of collaboration and the sharing of good practice and resources. They also valued the opportunity for flexibility of delivery, which allowed for emerging or changing priorities and maximised the value and benefit for improvement activities.
The factors which were seen as underpinning successful SCIF partnerships included: two-way trust and transparency based on commitment and willingness to share, empathy and understanding between college teams, the opportunity to visit, observe and discuss practice and a ‘critical friend’ peer-to-peer approach to sharing ideas and practice.
The Association of Colleges supports peer-led sector improvement and welcomed the creation of the SCIF. We have supported applicant and partner colleges through every stage of the process and would encourage all remaining eligible colleges to bid for the final round of the SCIF.Peer-led improvement programmes are a rich source of evidence about what works and can be of great value to our sector. Prime examples would be TeachToo and the Outstanding Teaching, Learning and Assessment (OTLA) programmes delivered by AoC and the Education and Training Foundation (ETF) working in partnership.
The process evaluation shows how powerful this model of improvement can be and AoC will continue to work with the DfE and colleges to develop and review the SCIF and help to evaluate its impact.
AoC would want all colleges to be able to benefit from the sharing of successful practice through pogrammes like the SCIF programme. Any college which identifies areas for improvement should be able to participate in a quality improvement peer network and the emerging learning should be shared widely in the sector. Relatively small sustained investment in quality improvement networks could help to permanently narrow performance gaps between colleges, and to deliver long-term sector-wide improvement.