- About Us
- About Colleges
-
Corporate Services
- Corporate Services
- Brexit
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability & Grievance
- Employment Briefings Library
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
- Governance
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Resources
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- Erasmus+ EXPECT Project
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Higher and Extended Project Qualifications
- OfS - Higher Education Social Prescribing Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase 2
- Pears #Iwill Youth Social Action Apprenticeship Project
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- T Level Curriculum Macro-Sequencing
- Contact the Projects Team
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Recruitment & Consultancy
- Events & Training
- Funding & Finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- 14-16 Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- Research Unit
- News, Campaigns & Parliament
- Love Our Colleges
- Home
- News, Campaigns & Parliament
- AoC Blogs
- To penalise or not to penalise
To penalise or not to penalise
Last week, the Skills Minister, Nick Boles MP, revealed that the Government is considering imposing financial penalties on school sixth forms that sign students up to A Levels that are “not appropriate” for them.
This was an interesting proposal. The Minister is right to look at how the system works and to ensure that what is right for the student is at the heart of the decision. It seems to signify a change of tone in Government policy on this area. This follows an appearance before the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee by Chris Wormald, Permanent Secretary of the Department for Education. He said that the rules for new academy sixth forms had been tightened up. This includes four tests for an academy wishing to add a sixth form:
There should be 200 students or more
More than 15 A Levels on offer
Evidence that there is a local shortage of post-16 places
Proposals are viable financially and so not involved cross-subsidies
It could be argued that these changes are closing the door long after the horse has bolted, but it is something that needs to happen. The Association of Colleges has been asking for this over the last couple of years, so it’s good that we are being listened to.
What is clear is that there needs to be a shift in mind set in schools and academies. There cannot be an assumption that A Levels are the best route for all. To make informed choices for the future, young people need high quality, impartial careers information about all post-16 education and training options, including apprenticeships and technical and professional education. The Government is already taking steps to achieve this. The announcement earlier this year that schools will be required by law to allow other providers to speak to students about the different routes available is a key step in the right direction for this.
Colleges are keen to work together with their local schools to ensure that all young people are able to choose the right course for them which lead to the best possible skills and qualifications needed for a successful career.
If the proposal to penalise schools becomes a definite decision it will take some years to take effect and is most likely to happen as part of a package of changes in response to Lord Sainsbury’s report on technical education routes, which is due out later in the Spring. Time will tell what the full implications of this will be.
Chris Walden is the Director of Public Affairs and Communications at the Association of Colleges.